Custom Search 1
Nelson-Abbey's picture
Nelson-Abbey
A voice for those in need, is sadly about to fall silent

UNDER PRESSURE: A UK Border Agency officer questions a suspected illegal migrant worker.

WE’VE HEARD a lot about the 200 or so ‘journalists’ who have lost their jobs as a result of the News Of The World returning to the great sewer in the sky.

But there’s likely to be little coverage on 300 other workers who will soon be out of a job, and with no likelihood of a Sunday Sun to save them. What is even worse is that, unlike the gutter rats at the NOTW, these guys provide an absolutely critical service.

The Immigration Advisory Service, an organisation that provides legal aid to migrants and refugees, has announced that it’s gone into administration.

This news comes nearly a year after Refugee and Migrant Justice, another large charitable organisation representing refugees and migrants also closed its doors in the face of financial difficulties. When they went into administration many thousands of clients, including the most vulnerable people imaginable such as children and victims of trafficking, lost their representation.

Together with other organisations, the Immigration Advisory Service was able to take some of these people on. But one has to wonder – where will they find the access to justice we profess to be so proud of in this country now?

The Immigration Advisory Service existed to represent those most needing representation, including refugees seeking asylum in the UK from often unimaginable horrors in their countries of origin. And contrary to what the News Of The World or other tabloids might have us believe, the staff who will be losing their jobs were not raking in taxpayers’ cash in legal aid fees. They were on modest salaries, struggling to survive in an environment where cuts have increasingly meant that vital services are harder and harder to provide.

Whilst legal aid will continue for asylum cases, funding has become increasingly restrictive and under the Government’s proposals, legal aid will no longer be available for most immigration cases.

Other areas will suffer too with access to the family courts, employment redress and welfare benefits appeals all affected by the legal aid cuts.

The sad thing is that refugees and other vulnerable people are right down the bottom of the list of causes you can provoke outrage for. Can you imagine a News Of The World or Sun campaign to ensure asylum seekers have access to justice and a fair hearing of their cases? Um...no. You are more likely to come across a determined crusade in the opposite direction.

It’s very convenient (as well as politically expedient) to dismantle a system of legal protection and hope no one notices. And even if they do, they won’t shout loud enough to stop it. Some may even cheer in celebration.
Sadly, that is what’s happening.

Your Voice

Comments

Life is good

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

Life is good when some authors like post their articles!

Fri, 2011-09-23 22:39

the Immigration Advisory Service has gone into administration

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous

I have personally freely helped persons with their migration conflicks, to a level of hearing advisement. Also having Immigration courts judges stretching the boundaries of there powers to keep BLACK persons in the UK. These are done without the need to be applicated to speak like a legal barrister or have any legal schoolings, as it is just 1. a simple application form, 2. fill in, 3. add positive proofs to application, 4. send off. 5. wait for answer. (thats how simple it is). 6. if refused it would have a coded reason, 7. send in appeal satisfying reason on refusal code only. (simple)

A hearing consisted of me having to explain to the immigration judges, that the solicitors and barrister representing were the clowns not answering to a simple immigration refusal code of 276D.

THE BARRISTER - after five years, wins the immigration case for his migrant client????, the immigration lawyers did not even turn up to the hearing?????? (the case continued against my advice).

Then somehow the judges decision is quoshed by the courts, this was done out of appeal process. As the migrants barrister in the case having saying something at the hearing he was not applicated to say, and what he said to defend his migrant client's refused application to stay in this great country of ours, was to appeal under the Citizen of the united kingdom and colonies (CUKC). The barrister made a complete defence for his migrant application but did not apply for it to be said/presented at the hearing. (then done a runner)

The next hearing was a bigger joke, THE SOLICITOR turns up with no files and tries to adjourn the hearing- the barrister did not turn up.

It took the solicitors five years to get to get an immigration appication to that stage.

To me it seems that people need to be more open in awareness that a solicitor sometime is not the best people to use, as they may hamper your immigration application more than you may think.

I feel it more for the vulnerable and uneducated and the general simple minded. As they need somebody to help.

Sun, 2011-08-07 14:09