MPs call for “urgent stop” to facial recognition surveillance

MPs across parties including David Davis MP, Diane Abbott MP, Jo Swinson MP, and Caroline Lucas MP call for an “immediate stop” to face surveillance

CRITICISM: The Metropolitan Police along with private companies have been criticised for their use of facial recognition software.

MPS HAVE called for UK police and private companies to “immediately stop” using live facial recognition surveillance in public spaces.

In a joint call published by civil liberties campaign group Big Brother Watch, the groups cited “serious concerns” about “incompatibility with human rights”, the “lack of an evidence base”, “discriminatory impact” and the “lack of a democratic mandate” for facial recognition surveillance.

Senior MPs across parties including former Minister David Davis MP, Shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott, Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson MP and Green MP Caroline Lucas are among parliamentarians backing the call. 

They join 25 rights, race equality and expert technology groups in calling for face surveillance to be urgently halted in the UK.

The call follows revelations of the surveillance being used in privately-owned public spaces, including the King’s Cross Estate in London, Meadowhall shopping centre in Sheffield, the World Museum in Liverpool and Birmingham’s Millennium Point centre.

Big Brother Watch estimates that “tens of millions” of people have been scanned and compared to “secret watch-lists” by facial recognition surveillance cameras in the UK without knowing about it.

The Metropolitan Police has used facial recognition surveillance 10 times across London since 2016, including twice at Notting Hill Carnival. In 2017, the force controversially used the technology to identify innocent people thought to have mental health problems at Remembrance Sunday.

An independent review into the use of live facial recognition commissioned by the Metropolitan Police found that over the four-year trials, 81% of ‘matches’ had wrongly identified innocent people as ‘wanted’. 

The review concluded it was “highly possible” that the force’s use of the technology would be found unlawful if challenged in court.

David Davis MP said: “Police use of facial recognition is potentially a serious invasion of individual privacy and civil liberties. We need a proper legal framework fit for these emerging technologies to balance policing effectiveness and privacy.

“There must be an immediate halt to the use of these systems to give Parliament the chance to debate it properly and establish proper rules for the police to follow.”

Big Brother Watch initiated a crowdfunded legal challenge against the Metropolitan Police and Home Secretary for their “lawless” use of facial recognition surveillance last year. The case has been paused pending the Metropolitan Police’s decision about their future use of the technology, which is yet to be published.

Anna Bacciarelli, Technology and Human Rights Adviser at Amnesty International, added: “Facial recognition systems pose serious threats to human rights – including the rights to privacy, non-discrimination, freedom of expression, association and assembly. Yet this technology is being used across the UK without adequate oversight and accountability.

“Given the huge risks to human rights, we urgently need a public debate about how and why this technology is being used – and who stands to benefit from its use. Until the human rights risks are addressed, facial recognition systems have no place in our public spaces.”

Comments Form

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Support The Voice

The Voice Newspaper is committed to celebrating black excellence, campaigning for positive change and informing the black community on important issues. Your financial contributions are essential to protect the future of the publication as we strive to help raise the profile of the black communities across the UK. Any size donation is welcome and we thank you for your continued support.

Support Sign-up