UK cold shoulders Africa on trade deals – but strikes deal with tiny Liechtenstein

Ministers talk of 'Global Britain' rings hollow when they can't even visit sub-Saharan Africa, say critics

NO DEAL: Britain shows no interest in trade agreements in Africa

THE BRITISH government have prioritised a post-Brexit trade deal with Liechtenstein over Africa, after it was revealed that trade ministers have only visited sub-Saharan Africa once in the past four years.

While Liz Truss, when she was trade secretary, struck a trade deal with the tiny state in the Alps – with a population equivalent to Canvey Island on the Essex coast – the entire sub-Saharan Africa was neglected despite having a combined population of 1.14 billion people.

In a parliamentary answer, trade minister James Duddridge admitted only one minister had visited sub-Saharan Africa since 2019, covering the period when Truss was secretary of state for trade, and foreign secretary.

This stands in stark contrast to the way Truss had boasted last year about the deal with Liechtenstein, with a population of just 38,000, or just 0.004% of the sub-Saharan Africa populous.

DISINTERESTED: Liz Truss has shown little interest in Africa (Pic: Getty)

Responding to a question by Labour MP Ruth Jones, Duddridge said: “Department for International Trade Ministers have visited sub-Saharan Africa once since the start of 2019. Former Minister for Exports visited Nigeria and South Africa in May 2022.”

The low priority given to Africa indicates that any post-Brexit trade deal with sub-Saharan nations is highly unlikely.

Truss, as Prime Minister, was recently rebuffed by US President Joe Biden who said there was no chance of a trade deal with Britain, in an echo of the time Barack Obama told the UK it would be “at the back of the queue” for a deal with the US if it left Europe.

The British government appear to have their eyes set on new trade deals with the primarily white nations of New Zealand, Australia and Canada.

Reacting to news about lack of trade contact with sub-Saharan Africa, Labour councillor and activist Adam Jogee said: “The Tories promised us a ‘Global Britain’ but that hasn’t extended to parts of the world that made this country so wealthy in years gone by.

“Global Britain won’t happen without a respectful, open and honest relationship between the UK and Africa as a continent.

“The fact that one Tory Trade Minister in three years bothered to visit says it all. No respect, no plan and no engagement. It says it all really.”

Botswana, Rwanda, Eritrea, Eswatini and Kenya are all enjoying higher GPD growth than Britain.

Government sources insist that ministerial visits are far from the only way to promote trading relationships, and that the Africa minister in the Foreign and Commonwealth department, who has made several visits to the continent, also promotes trade.

There has been criticism about the lack of attention given to increasing Africa’s energy production to ease the West’s cost of living crisis, with some commentators suspecting that rich nations would rather see their own people suffer than boost Africa’s economies with oil and gas exports.

A Department for International Trade spokesperson said: “Since the UK became an independent trading nation, we’ve secured 9 trade agreements covering 18 African countries, including 15 in sub-Saharan Africa. Our financial support for infrastructure projects in the region totalled £2.3bn in the last year alone.

“Despite the travel restrictions of the pandemic, the UK hosted the UK-Africa Investment Summit in 2020 and a further two Investment Conferences – in 2021 and 2022.

“The former Minister for Exports was able to visit South Africa and Nigeria once travel opened up earlier this year, building on extensive ministerial-led engagement that had necessarily been virtual.”

Comments Form

2 Comments

  1. | DAZZA

    Africa should not do a deal with its former slave master. What was independence for if Africa runs to to former slave master. Africa can prosper by forming its own European Union or better still an United States of Africa with one Armed Forces to protect itself

    Reply

  2. | Chaka Artwell

    Hurt, humiliation and debasement are the feelings His Majesty’s African and African Caribbean-heritage Subjects feel today knowing that His Majesty’s new Conservative Prime Minister, the Rt Hon ‘Liz’ Truss MP, and her assortment of ethnic Cabinet Ministers, have ignored a Trade Deal with the former English Empire nations of Africa; and the Caribbean, but have secured a trade deal with the tiny nation of Liechtenstein: which is best known for its banking activities.

    I am sure most Voice Readers will be hurt by this trade deal with Liechtenstein.

    I am psychologically hurt by another example of Parliament’s rejection of its former African colonial nations and people.

    How can I have a positive sense of being a valued member of English history, society and His Majesty’s African-heritage Subject; whose African ancestors massively contributed to the wealth and well-being of the Monarch, and this English nation, when the English nation of my birth, uses every opportunity possible to marginalise; ignore or overlook the historical contribution of African-heritage Subjects-and ignores current skin-colour disparity endured daily by His Majesty’s African and African Caribbean heritage Subjects.

    The exclusion of Africa and the Caribbean nations as valued Trading Partners for sovereign and independent Parliament, that has left the European Union, by a Cabinet that has two African-heritage members, teaches Voice Readers of the complete folly and unsuitability of “diversity” as the preferred Left-wing solution to England’s historical skin-colour prejudice; segregation and racism as experienced by African-heritage subjects.

    What is the point of the “Commonwealth” when His Majesty’s Parliament ignores the non-Caucasian nations in African and the Caribbean?

    Evan the 150,000 Africans who offered their lives during England’s First and Second European Wars have continually been dishonoured; debased and written out of the mainstream war textbooks.

    For 500 years African people have been intimately associated with the English Monarch and English people.

    Nevertheless, African-heritage people are still only grudgingly tolerated by the Establishment; so long as they only repeat the opinions: view and thinking of the State.

    If any Voice Reader could recommend an African-led nation, that would welcome one of His Majesty’s African-heritage Subject, please let me know.

    Psychologically, knowing that England never can be describe as “home” for anyone with African-skin is disturbing: unsettling and mentally destabilising.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Support The Voice

The Voice Newspaper is committed to celebrating black excellence, campaigning for positive change and informing the black community on important issues. Your financial contributions are essential to protect the future of the publication as we strive to help raise the profile of the black communities across the UK. Any size donation is welcome and we thank you for your continued support.

Support Sign-up