Remembering the contribution of black people who served in the wars

Guy Hewitt writes about why it's important to remember the black people who sacrificed their lives in the World Wars

Guy Hewitt, the Church of England's first racial justice director

WHETHER ON the 11th hour, of the 11th day, of the 11th month, or on Remembrance Sunday, we are encouraged to pause to remember those who sacrificed their lives in World War I (WWI) and other major conflicts. In our acts of Remembrance, we remember all those who defended, against the worst of humanity, the structures we take for granted. In our acts of Remembrance, we remember those who offered their lives to provide space for peace and humanity to flourish.

While these events seem many lifetimes removed, the Russian invasion of the Ukraine and the threat of a possible deployment of nuclear weapons, hopefully idle, rekindled a fear of global warfare not experienced since the Cuban missile crisis. Our acts of Remembrance join the past to the issues of the present, demanding that we continue to pay attention to and learn from them so that such inhumanity is not repeated.

Regarding the WWI servicemen from the Caribbean, what amazing grace that less than a hundred years after Emancipation Black men volunteered for the fight and, for many, ultimately died for a king they had never seen, against an enemy they didn’t really know, in lands not hitherto set down upon.

Conservative estimates indicate that during WWI, well over 4 million non-white men were mobilised into combat and non-combat roles in the British, European and American armed forces.

The colonial regime placed a different value on Commonwealth personnel compared to the English soldiers. Non-white soldiers generally received less pay, sometimes as little as a third of what their English counterparts earned.

Black and brown soldiers were also barred from fighting on the Western Front because it was feared allowing them to fight alongside and against white Europeans would undermine colonial rule. Though Commonwealth soldiers played a vital role in the Allied victory, after the War their contribution was suppressed to protect the monochromatic image of the British Empire.

Most tragically but not unsurprisingly, the racial prejudice experienced in life was also perpetuated in death.

Established in 1917, the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC), at more than 20,000 sites in over 150 countries, preserves in perpetuity the memory of more than 1.7 million Commonwealth citizens who lost their lives in WWI, WWII, and other conflicts. From the outset this work was to be characterised by the principle of ‘equality of treatment in death’.

The 2021 Report commissioned by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission to Review Historical Inequalities in Commemoration revealed that hundreds of thousands of non-white British soldiers from African, Asia, the Caribbean, and The Gulf were commemorated ‘unequally’; many received no headstone, too many were not commemorated by name or possibly at all.

The report found that: “The [War Graves Commission] is responsible for these shortcomings – either because of its own decision making or its complicity in the decision making of other authorities. In certain circumstances [it] did not stand by its principles.” The report is yet another indictment of the racist attitudes in the Colonial Office and War Office both during and after WWI. That it took more than a hundred years to mark these lives is indicative that such attitudes do not easily disappear, if ever.

Unbeknown at the time, Commonwealth soldiers were fighting two enemies at once: the brutal foes on the battlefield and the systemic racism and prejudice of colonialism. While the former conflict ended with the Armistice, the latter struggle persists insidiously.

These racist attitudes then pervasive, remain embedded in our systems today. Racism not only provided a justification for slavery but also for colonialism. It allowed for the ransacking not only of natural resources but also human resources.

Black men’s lives mattered so little that even their deaths were not properly recorded.

The 2021 report contains recommendations around three central themes: first, to extend geographically and chronologically a search of the historical record for inequalities in commemoration and address them. Secondly, the CWGC is encouraged to renew the commitment to equality of treatment in death through the construction of physical and/or digital commemorations.

Finally, it called for the need to acknowledge and accept this difficult history and share it with all those of the former British Empire touched by the two world wars, lest they forget.

Guy Hewitt ministers in the Church of England and advocates for racial justice and social inclusion. 

Comments Form

2 Comments

  1. | Chaka Artwell

    American people of African-heritage; African-Caribbean, and Continental Africans, should never have offered their life in defence of their Caucasian Masters, or Caucasian European Colonial Masters, during both of Europe’s European wars.

    With the end of the Second European war, the African-heritage soldiers continued to be treated without natural justice by their Caucasian Masters.

    In the 1950s, the English took the best farmlands in Kenya, causing the returning Kenyan soldiers to become destitute.

    The destitute returning Kenyan soldiers joined the Mau Mau resistance to English rule in Kenya in the 1950s.

    The Algerian war against France was caused by similar ill-treatment of France’s African colonial soldiers.

    The Lynching of African Americans increased in the United States against returning Second European War African-American soldiers, because Caucasian Americans wanted to remind African-Americans of their place in segregated and Jim Crow United States in 1945-47.
    History reveals clearly that African-heritage people should never have offered their life in defence of their Caucasian Masters, in the mistaken belief that having offered their lives, the Caucasian Masters would give justice and dignity to their oppressed African-heritage Subjects.

    Reply

  2. | Chaka Artwell

    American people of African-heritage; African-Caribbean, and Continental Africans, should never have offered their life in defence of their Caucasian Masters, or Caucasian European Colonial Masters, during both of Europe’s European wars.

    With the end of the Second European war, the African-heritage soldiers continued to be treated without natural justice by their Caucasian Masters.

    In the 1950s, the English took the best farmlands in Kenya, causing the returning Kenyan soldiers to become destitute.

    The destitute returning Kenyan soldiers joined the Mau Mau resistance to English rule in Kenya in the 1950s.

    The Algerian war against France was caused by similar ill-treatment of France’s African colonial soldiers.

    The Lynching of African Americans increased in the United States against returning Second European War African-American soldiers, because Caucasian Americans wanted to remind African-Americans of their place in segregated and Jim Crow United States in 1945-47.
    History reveals clearly that African-heritage people should never have offered their life in defence of their Caucasian Masters, in the mistaken belief that having offered their lives, the Caucasian Masters would give justice and dignity to their oppressed African-heritage Subjects.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

Support The Voice

The Voice Newspaper is committed to celebrating black excellence, campaigning for positive change and informing the black community on important issues. Your financial contributions are essential to protect the future of the publication as we strive to help raise the profile of the black communities across the UK. Any size donation is welcome and we thank you for your continued support.

Support Sign-up